Comments on: Series continues: Wahine LSs

By: Cindy Luis

Cindy Luis — Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:25:58 +0000

The blog is what it is. It is designed for opinion, based on the facts or perception. Makes for interesting discussion .. or not.
Agree that some posters throw negative spaghetti out there to see if it will stick or to incite responses.
Sometimes silence is the best response (Of course, so my delete button. 😉
Thanks for the kind words. Ann’s been doing this since 1980 with the Wahine, I came a year later. She has done it consecutively while I took a couple of years off as sports editor of the Star-Bulletin.

By: Grammy

Grammy — Sat, 24 Aug 2013 05:41:29 +0000

I find reading the two writers who cover the Wahine to be insightful, elucidating and nuanced. Their combined knowledge of the history of the Wahine program, players past and present and coaches is fair and balanced. I don’t see much if any bias in what they report and their insights and details seem to bring out more than mere statistics can convey. This blog on the other hand seems to be the province of heavily opinionated individuals who comment to draw responses and comment to incite under the guise of “inside” knowledge. I just don’t read or wish to comment on things of such a supercilious nature. Go Wahine! And thank you thank you thank you Ann and Cindy, you make my day!

By: LC

LC — Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:29:40 +0000

When you read an article by a sports writer you should only read the quotes of the coaches and players if you want it to make any sense.